The relationship between Latitudinarian moral theology and eighteenth-century literature has been much debated among scholars. However, this issue can only be tackled if the exact objectives of the Latitudinarians’ moral theology are clearly delineated. In doing so, Patrick Müller unveils the intricate connection between the didactic bias of Latitudinarianism and the resurgent interest in didactic literary genres in the first half of the eighteenth century. His study sheds new light on the complex and contradictory reception of the Latitudinarians’ controversial theses in the work of three of the major eighteenth-century novelists: Henry Fielding, Laurence Sterne, and Oliver Goldsmith.

The Author: Patrick Müller was born in 1975 and studied English Literature and Language, Philosophy, and German Language and Literature at the Universities of Münster and Edinburgh between 1996 and 2006.

: Latitudinarian Moral Theology – The Moralization of Literature, Poetic Justice, and Sentimentalism – The Moral Purpose of Henry Fielding’s Art – The Comedy of Human Imperfection in Laurence Sterne – Oliver Goldsmith and the Literary Uses of Religion. Inhaltsverzeichnis